Sony Alpha A-300 DSLR versus Olympus E-510 DSLR?
I am considering DSLR cameras with (a) anti-shake, (b) dust reduction, and (c) live view, at about 10 megapixels. In my price range this leaves the E-510 (olympus) and the A-300 (Sony). Sony has more "used lens deals" since its lens format is more established, and Olympus uses the smaller/lighter 4/3 lens format. Other than that, which is a better deal? I believe these are the only two DSLR bodies in this price range with all three bleeding-edge killer features above.
Sony A300
Compared to Olympus E-510
The Olympus E-510 was one of the most feature-packed DSLRs of 2007 and heavy discounting means it remains one of the best buys in the market. Like the A300, the E-510 has Live View and built-in sensor-shift stabilisation which works on any lens you attach. In its favour, the E-510’s SuperSonic Wave Filter is the best anti-dust system we’ve tested, and while it may not eliminate all foreign particles, it does a great job of making them virtually impossible to see. And while its built-in stabilisation may not be visible through the optical viewfinder, unlike the Sony A300, it can be previewed on-screen. By using the main sensor for Live View, you’ll also see an exact preview of what you’re taking.
In its favour, the A300 has quicker AF in Live View, a tiltable screen which is also bigger at 2.7in, and a slightly longer 18-70mm kit lens. But while the E-510 may be out-featured in these respects, there’s no arguing with its bargain price, especially with the twin lens kit which simply offers remarkable value right now.
Go with the Sony A300.